Plain-English summaryThis document consists of transcript excerpts from an oral history interview with Captain Joseph Finnegan alongside a brief topical note regarding Amelia Earhart. Finnegan states that communications intelligence units at Cavite and Pearl Harbor intercepted traffic between Tokyo and the Mandates in 1937 but found no mention of Earhart, characterizing theories of Japanese capture as unsubstantiated rumors. The accompanying note observes that captured Japanese records from Saipan remain largely unexamined and states that government agencies continue to be queried despite lacking pertinent intelligence on her disappearance.
Key line (verbatim from the document)“We were reading some traffic between Tokyo and the Mandates, But the name Earhart never came up”
Summary written with AI help from the document text and checked against it; the key line is matched word for word to the text. Read the original before citing.
Full text (5,705 characters)
Ae oe
Annex Two
to Tape #7
Tape #8 MS
Tape #9 MS
Volume #10
1 UNCLASSIFIED
14 SECRET HVCCO
30 SECRET HVCCO
71 SECRET HvCco
Japanese CV losses
at MIDWAY
Operational use of
COMINT in Pacific,
particularly YAMAMOTO,
Saipan/Tinian, and
other events
China Clipper, Earhart,
Peking, MIDWAY, organiza-
tion at FRUPAC, crypto-
logic training prior to
WIT
All other information,
some not prepared by
CAPT FINNEGAN and some
not classified
Released pursuant to ODNI memo,
dated 1 October 2025, ES 2025-01253: “DECLASSIFICATION OF US
GOVERNMENT RECORDS RELATED TO THE DISAPPERANCE OF AMELIA EARHART” and E.O. 13526, Paragraph 3.1(d)
it would be today, and very possible, I think that that was the final
conclusion. I am sure that a search of the records some place will show
the official conclusion as to how she was lost. I would merely guess that
it was probably due to operational failure.
A: But was there suspicion that the Japanese were at fault?
F: ‘There was indeed, because there was a fairly prominent Chinese on
board. He could be loosely described as a prosperous "chop suey king"
in this country and had a large amount of cash that he was bringing to
China to help them in their resistaace to Japanese aggression. Giving
rise to some speculation that there could have been sabotage of Japanese
origin.
A: Do you recall any similar suspicions regarding Amelia Earharts plane?
That is, were there suspicions at that time that the Japanese’..?
F: No, merely wild opinions that she had been taken care of somewhere
or other by the Japanese, at Saipan probably.
A: Do you recall, when you were at Pearl Harbor during world War IT,
whether these rumors still persisted?
F; They've never died.
A: Do you recall any intelligence at Cavite regarding Amelia?
F: Absolutely nothing. Although the event took place shortly prior
to my arrival at Cavite, I am virtually certain I would have learned
whether or not there had been any COMINT about it. Holtwick agrees,
and he was there at the time of her disappearance, that there was none.
A: In 1937 was the Cavite Unit reading traffic between the Japanese
officials in the Mandates and Tokyo?
Released pursuant to ODNI memo, dated 1 October 2025, ES 2025-01253: “DECLASSIFICATION OF US
GOVERNMENT RECORDS RELATED TO THE DISAPPERANCE OF AMELIA EARHART” and E.O. 13526, Paragraph 3.1(d)
F: A little. They ignored the termszsof the mandate and simply treated
them as parts of the Japanese Empire to be exploited to their heart's
content. We were reading some traffic between Tokyo and the Mandates,
But the name Earhart never came up.
A: Is it likely that Pearl Harbor Unit was also reading some of this
traffic?
F: More than likely.
A: Coming to another subject. Did the U. S. have a COMINT Facility in
Peiping, in the late 30s?
F: In 1937 I was assigned as interpreter’ to the Naval Attache (Captain
Bemis) and the Assistant Naval Attache for Air (then Lieutenant Commander
Ofstie).
A: What time was this? What year?
F: This was the summer of 37. On one trip Captain Bemis took Oftsie
and myself to Kuve. We left him there and Ofstie and I went on to Korea
to inspect two Japanese Naval Facilities over there. One was the Minor
Naval Base of Chinkai and a neighboring Air Station. After we had com-
pleted our inspection duties in Korea, Ofstie had further authorization
and ordersto proceed to Chefoo, it then being the summer and they had a
few Navy Seaplanes based on the JASON, an old collier that had been
converted into a seaplane tender. He went over there because one of the
terms of agreement before he went to Tokyo, was that he was to be given
opportunities to get his required flight hours in his log to qualify him
for additional pay, as a Naval aviator. My orders for this trip included
about 10 days leave to visit Manchuria and China. I had always wanted
Released pursuant to ODNI memo, dated 1 October 2025, ES 2025-01253: “DECLASSIFICATION OF US
GOVERNMENT RECORDS RELATED TO THE DISAPPERANCE OF AMELIA EARHART” and E.O. 13526, Paragraph 3.1(d)
4. Amelia Earhart Note
5. Strategic vs Tactical Planning Remarks
6. Realism and National Security
"7, ABF and Yamamoto
8. Doolittle Raid Item
F. LANGUAGE OFFICER HISTORY IN TOKYO WITH BIOGRAPHICAL MATERIAL APPENDER.
Nog atts ched
i *
r
Released pursuant to ODNI memo, dated 1 October 2025, ES 2025-01253: “DECLASSIFICATION OF US
GOVERNMENT RECORDS RELATED TO THE DISAPPERANCE OF AMELIA EARHART” and E.O. 13526, Paragraph 3.1 (d)
AMELIA EARHART NOTE
The fate of Amelia, like the background of "The Flying Dutchman" has
‘been and will always and recurrently generate "Sunday Supplement" typeof
sensational articles. The same old ground gets raked over and over with
nothing new coming to light. One wonders where the 22 tons of Japanese
yecords removed from Saipan are buried. Most of them were never microfilmed
and possibly were never aven scanned by competent personnel. On a purely
weight basis alone estimates have been made that with average and practical
facilities available that it would take sbout 150 years to translate then.
Above mentioned solely because of tha recurrent nature of the topic.
Periodically NHD and other government agencies have been and will continue
to be harassed by researchers and writers who are seeking to profit by
resurrection of the atory. I have been assured, and have some peraonal
knowledge that there is not in existence any information bearing on this
subject in material to which NHD may not have current access te:
Released pursuant to ODNI memo, dated 1 October 2025, ES 2025-01253: “DECLASSIFICATION OF US
GOVERNMENT RECORDS RELATED TO THE DISAPPERANCE OF AMELIA EARHART” and E.O. 13526, Paragraph 3.1(d)