Plain-English summary
This chapter details the prosecution and September 1990 conviction of retired CIA officer Thomas G. Clines for federal tax fraud. Clines received substantial profits for coordinating weapons logistics for the Enterprise and concealed his earnings and secret Swiss financial accounts from the Internal Revenue Service. The text reviews his financial transactions, trial testimony from co-conspirators, and efforts by the Independent Counsel to reconstruct Enterprise financial ledgers.
Key line (verbatim from the document)“In September 1990, Clines was convicted of four income-tax-related felony charges, following a two-week jury trial in U.S. District Court in Baltimore, Maryland, before Judge Norman P. Ramsey”
Summary written with AI help from the document text and checked against it; the key line is matched word for word to the text. Read the original before citing.
Tags
Albert HakimBaltimore, MarylandBethesda, MarylandCIACentral AmericaCompagnie de Services FiduciairesDefex PortugalEuropeGenevaGeoffrey S. BermanInternal Revenue ServiceLisbonNorman P. RamseyOffice of Independent CounselRichard V. SecordStuart E. AbramsThe EnterpriseThomas G. ClinesWillard ZuckerWilliam M. Treanor
SourceOffice of Independent Counsel. Original. U.S. government work, public domain.
Full text (14,406 characters)
Walsh Iran / Contra Report - Chapter 11 United States v. Thomas G. Clines, a.k.a. ``C. Tea''
Chapter 11
United States v. Thomas G. Clines, a.k.a. ``C. Tea''
Thomas G. Clines, a retired CIA agent, earned nearly $883,000 helping retired Air Force Maj.
Gen. Richard V. Secord and Albert Hakim carry out the secret operations of the Enterprise.
Clines oversaw the logistics of purchasing weapons from private suppliers in Europe and
arranging for their delivery to Central America. In early contra weapons sales in 1985, he
received 20 percent of the profits; in 1986, he began receiving a third of the profits from the
contra sales.
In February 1990, following the guilty pleas and promises of cooperation by Secord and
Hakim, Clines was indicted and charged with concealing from the Internal Revenue Service the
full amount of his Enterprise profits for the 1985 and 1986 tax years. He was charged also with
denying on his 1985 and 1986 income-tax returns his foreign financial accounts, in which he hid
his Enterprise profits and from which he and his surrogates transferred thousands of dollars to his
U.S. bank accounts.
In September 1990, Clines was convicted of four income-tax-related felony charges,
following a two-week jury trial in U.S. District Court in Baltimore, Maryland, before Judge
Norman P. Ramsey.1
1 The prosecution's case was presented by Associate Counsel Stuart E. Abrams, Geoffrey S.
Berman and William M. Treanor.
The trial was held in U.S. District Court in Baltimore because Clines' accountant was based in
Bethesda, Maryland, and filed Clines' tax forms there.
The Charges
Clines was charged with two felony counts of falsely underreporting his gross receipts on his
1985 and 1986 tax returns. He was charged also with two felony counts of falsely denying
having foreign financial accounts on his tax returns for 1985 and 1986.
Clines on his 1985 tax return falsely reported his gross receipts as totaling $265,000 -- or
$203,431 less than his income from his Enterprise activities proved at trial. On his 1986 tax
return, Clines reported his gross receipts as $402,513 -- or $57,009 less than he actually received
from the Enterprise. In both cases, Independent Counsel's estimates of Clines' underreported
income were conservative.
Regarding his foreign financial accounts, Clines denied having such accounts on 1985 and
1986 income tax forms requiring their disclosure. In fact, Independent Counsel proved through
extensive documentation and testimony that Clines had knowledge and control of large sums of
money abroad in two secret Swiss accounts: the ``T.C.'' capital account he maintained with
Compagnie de Services Fiduciaires (CSF) in Geneva in 1985, and the ``C. Tea'' investment
account he maintained with CSF in 1986.
The Clines Trial
The central prosecution witnesses at the Clines trial were Secord, who was compelled to
testify under a cooperation agreement with Independent Counsel, and Willard Zucker, the CSF
financial manager of the secret Swiss Enterprise accounts and shell corporations, who also
testified under a grant of immunity from prosecution. Thomas Cusick, a special agent with the
Internal Revenue Service, testified about the complex financial structure of the Enterprise.
Clines, a 30-year veteran of the CIA, after leaving the agency in 1978, had developed
significant contacts with arms dealers in Western Europe and behind the Iron Curtain. In 1985
and 1986, after becoming involved in the Enterprise, Clines was responsible for locating and
purchasing weapons abroad and shipping them to Central America. He worked primarily with
the arms company Defex Portugal, maintaining a small office at the company in Lisbon. When
the Enterprise became involved in secret U.S. weapons shipments to Iran late in 1985, Clines
also became active in this aspect of its activities.2
2 Clines accompanied Secord in late November 1985 to Europe to facilitate a snagged
shipment of U.S. HAWK missiles from Israel to Iran. In the summer of 1986, Clines became
involved in an unsuccessful Ross Perot-funded hostage-rescue operation in which the
Enterprise's Danish freighter, the Erria, waited off the coast of Cyprus where a $1 million
exchange was to be made for a hostage release. This operation did not result in a release.
In 1985, Clines began receiving 20 percent of the profits from each arms shipment, plus
expenses. He received his first share in April 1985, when $310,840 was distributed among
Secord and Hakim, who each received $124,366, and Clines, who got $62,168. A capital
account was maintained by CSF for Clines. He had some of this money wired from this account
to the United States, withdrew some of it in cash, and transferred some amounts to a third party
for his benefit. In 1985, a total of $155,000 was wired from Clines' capital account to his
account at First American Bank in Virginia. Clines also made cash withdrawals from the TC
capital account totaling $217,820. At trial the evidence showed that Clines' gross receipts in
1985 were at least $468,431. This figure represented $423,431 from the Enterprise and $45,000
from non-Enterprise sources. The estimate was conservative.
In 1986, as the Enterprise continued selling arms to the contras, its involvement in the secret
U.S. sale of arms to Iran generated a new source of funds for Clines, Secord, and Hakim. Clines'
share of the distributions increased to 30 percent, like Secord and Hakim. (The final 10 percent
of the distribution went to Scitech, a company jointly owned by Secord and Hakim.) As a result
of these pro-rated distributions, Clines received $420,238 in 1986. In addition, Clines received
four small distributions from the Enterprise in 1986. On February 18, 1986, CSF transferred
$7,000 to the bank account of a friend of Clines in South Carolina for Clines' personal benefit.
On May 2, 1986, CSF wired $1,137 and on July 7, 1986, CSF wired $1,147 to the Klinik
Buchinger to pay for Clines' attendance at that weight-reduction clinic. On November 10, 1986,
CSF transferred $30,000 into an investment account that Clines maintained with CSF. Thus,
Clines' total receipts from the Enterprise in 1986 were at least $459,522.3
3 Clines also received $70,000 in other payments from the Enterprise in 1986. But since the
underlying documents did not clearly establish the nature of these additional funds, they were not
included in the estimate of Clines' underreporting. In addition, in 1986 Clines' bank accounts in
the United States received wire transfers of $160,000 from unknown foreign sources. This
money was not included in calculating Clines' true gross receipts.
When Clines opened an Enterprise account in late spring or early summer 1986, he decided to
use an assumed name. Zucker suggested ``C. Tea,'' and Clines agreed. Clines signed the
agreement using his assumed name, C. Tea; his real name does not appear on that document.
Clines earned income of $17,135.10 on the deposits in the C. Tea account during 1986.
Enterprise activities were effectively curtailed in November 1986 with the exposure of the
Iran arms sales. Clines expressed concern about his inability to obtain his funds. Hakim, at
Clines' request, persuaded Zucker 4 to release Clines' funds.
4 The Government proffered at trial that, if permitted to testify about his conversation with
Hakim, Zucker would testify that ``Mr. Hakim alerted Mr. Zucker to the fact that Mr. Clines was
a former CIA field operative and was potentially violent, and [Mr. Hakim] suggested that Mr.
Zucker should give him his money back.'' (Zucker, Clines Trial Testimony, 9/7/90, p. 551.) The
Government contended that this testimony was admissible as to Zucker's state of mind, since, on
the cross-examination of Secord, defense counsel had elicited testimony that Zucker was a
``basket case'' in early December 1986. (Secord, Clines Trial Testimony, 9/5/90, p. 214). The
Court ruled the substance of the Hakim-Zucker conversation inadmissible. (Zucker, Clines Trial
Testimony, 9/7/90, pp. 552-53.)
When Zucker began to liquidate Clines' investment account on December 4, 1986, Clines
instructed Zucker that he wanted the funds transferred to a numbered Swiss bank account that
Zucker recognized as Defex Portugal. Clines gave Zucker a letter specifying that the money was
to be transferred for ``services rendered.'' On December 19, 1986, CSF transferred $311,600 as
directed. Thereafter, Clines told Secord in December 1986 that he had received his money from
Zucker.
At trial, Clines acknowledged that he had the C. Tea funds transferred to a Defex Portugal
account so it could be handled for Clines' by Defex head Jose Garnel. According to Clines, only
$266,000 had been transferred to Defex from the C. Tea account. In fact, $311,600 had actually
been transferred. Clines testified that he only learned this after being indicted. Clines described
a complicated series of personal ``loans'' between him and Garnel. He said he believed Garnel
deliberately concealed the true amount and stole the difference from him.
The Garnel-Clines ``loans'' were among a series of Clines' financial maneuvers to conceal
income. In addition, Clines stored large amounts of cash in Swiss safety deposit boxes,
withdrawing and carrying funds to banks and individuals, who would subsequently wire the
amounts to his U.S. bank accounts. He also signed over real estate holdings to friends and
family, while continuing to pay for them and claiming the payments as income-tax deductions.
In his 1985 and 1986 tax returns, Clines followed a consistent practice: He reported what he
believed the Government knew and could prove against him, and nothing more. Beginning in
1982, Clines used as his accountant Melvyn Leshinsky, in Bethesda, Maryland. As previously
discussed, Clines' gross receipts in 1985 were at least $468,431. The figure he actually reported
was $265,000, a shortfall of $203,431. The basis for the $265,000 figure was Clines' January 10,
1986, letter to Leshinsky listing his gross income for 1985 ``as reflected on my bank statements''
-- exactly the amount that he brought into the United States that was traceable to him. The
money that Clines left abroad was not reported.
In answering ``no'' to the question whether Clines had an interest in or authority over a foreign
account, Leshinsky specifically asked Clines whether he had an account in any foreign country;
Clines said he did not. In 1983, Clines and various of his corporate entities had been the subject
of a criminal investigation. Leshinsky in the context of that investigation, found that Clines
controlled a bank account in Bermuda in 1981 and had not reported it. Leshinsky had to have
Clines file a corrected form. Given this prior record, it was clear that Clines was familiar with
the reporting requirement for foreign accounts.5
5 In March 1987, after Clines had been subpoenaed by the Office of Independent Counsel,
Leshinsky, Clines, and Clines' then-lawyer John Stein met to review Clines' finances. Clines
stated in essence that when his 1985 income tax returns were filed, he had not grasped the
difference between net and gross and that the figure on his income tax returns for gross receipts
was actually his net receipts. The three agreed that Clines should file an amended return. The
amended return was eventually filed on November 2, 1987. On that return, a gross receipts
figure of $486,490 was reported. The cost-of-goods-sold figure of $152,640 was $68,850 short
of offsetting the increase in the gross receipts from the original return. The cost-of-goods-sold
figure was unsubstantiated: Clines did not provide Leshinsky with any support for that figure.
Clines did not tell Leshinsky of reimbursements that he had received from the Enterprise for
expenses.
Leshinsky also prepared Clines' 1986 income tax return. Initially, Clines represented to
Leshinsky that his gross receipts were $297,673. Later, he informed Leshinsky his gross receipts
were $342,673. On the income tax returns as filed, his gross receipts were listed as $402,513, or
$57,009 less than his proven gross receipts.
The 1986 income tax return also contained a false denial that Clines had a foreign account.
Again, Leshinsky had asked Clines whether he had a foreign account, and Clines answered no.
None of the $17,135 Clines earned in income from his C. Tea account was reported.
At trial, Clines claimed that the underreporting on tax returns arose from his inability to
understand the difference between net and gross income. He referred to his 1985 capital account
as his ``profit account,'' but said he did not believe it was reportable. He nonetheless
acknowledged control over the funds. He admitted that the answer on his income tax returns
stating that he did not have a foreign account was ``incorrect.'' 6
6 Clines, Clines Trial Testimony, 9/14/90, p. 1305.
Secord attempted to confuse the jury by suggesting that Government evidence against Clines
was based on inaccurate financial records fabricated, or ``cooked,'' by Hakim.7 In fact, some
financial records were reconfigured by Zucker at Hakim's request. In late 1986, Hakim instructed
CSF to collapse separate profit accounts into one ledger so that payments to Clines, Secord and
himself could not be identified. This document, according to Zucker, was known as the ``Hakim
ledger.'' The ``Hakim ledger,'' however, was not what the Government used to prove its case. As
described previously, Independent Counsel reconstructed the profit accounts, going piece by
piece through thousands of pages of foreign and domestic bank records that illuminated in detail
the true financial machinations of the Enterprise and Clines' personal profits.8
7 Secord, Clines Trial Testimony, 9/5/90, p. 219.
8 The key to understanding the collapsed profit accounts was provided by Roland Farina, an
assistant to Zucker, who retained codes on the Hakim ledger that corresponded to the receipts.
Verdict and Sentence
The jury found Clines guilty on all four counts in the indictment on September 18, 1990. On
December 13, 1990, Judge Ramsey sentenced Clines to 16 months in prison and a $40,000 fine.
On appeal, the convictions were affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
The Supreme Court denied certiorari.